Stan Fitzgerald produced an educational election integrity panel bringing Arizona Audit Manager Jeff Zink into Georgia.

In October 2021

Stan Fitzgerald produced an election integrity educational discussion featuring Garland Favorito of VoterGA. Favorito is Georgia’s leading election integrity expert and has received multiple shout outs from President Trump. Also speaking is Jeff Zink who ran the Arizona Audit and Georgia Congressional candidate YG Nyghtstorm who was endorsed by Veterans for America First.

Nyghtstorm with Fitzgerald’s evidence of a possible election fraud connection between Maricopa County AZ and Fulton County GA attempted to hand deliver a private investigator report to the GA FBI and was turned away at the agency without their even looking at the evidence.

The seminar can be viewed on Rumble at https://rumble.com/v1835hv-stan-fitzgerald-production-of-an-election-integrity-panel-featuring-garland.html

Fitzgerald also participated with the Arizona investigations by producing an alleged ballot fraud witness from Maricopa see : https://stanfitzgeraldnews.com/2021/09/24/stan-fitzgerald-led-an-investigation-into-ballots-shipping-from-maricopa-county-az-to-fulton-county-ga-during-the-2020-election/

The Cyber Ninjas report identified about 57,000 ballots with potential issues for further review. No actual criminal law enforcement investigation was ever ordered, and the evidence was never adjudicated before a judge as civil cases were dismissed.

The Arizona Attorney General’s 2022 review did not constitute a criminal adjudication of the approximately 57,000 ballots identified for potential review in the Cyber Ninjas report. The Attorney General did not conduct a voter-by-voter investigation, did not interview or subpoena the alleged voters, and did not litigate the validity of those ballots in court. Rather, the AG issued an investigative opinion that it found no evidence sufficient to bring criminal charges based on records review and existing administrative explanations. No court ever reached the merits or adjudicated the evidentiary claims related to those ballots. Accordingly, the conclusion represents a prosecutorial assessment, not a judicial determination that no unlawful ballots were cast.